Skip to content

MQE-1059: When a single test is specified all suites should not generate #148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 14, 2018
Merged

MQE-1059: When a single test is specified all suites should not generate #148

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 14, 2018

Conversation

imeron2433
Copy link
Contributor

  • add logic to flatten assoc array and wrap suite generation in conditional logic

Description

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. magento/magento2-functional-testing-framework#<issue_number>: Issue title
  2. ...

Contribution checklist

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/verification tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds on Travis CI are green)
  • Changes to Framework doesn't have backward incompatible changes for tests or have related Pull Request with fixes to tests

@imeron2433
MQE-1059: When a single test is specified all suites should not generate
5bdd3d2 
- add logic to flatten assoc array and wrap suite generation in conditional logic
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 57.316% when pulling 737b3c5 on MQE-1059 into 5307abb on develop.

@imeron2433 imeron2433 merged commit c66df37 into develop Jun 14, 2018
@imeron2433 imeron2433 deleted the MQE-1059 branch June 14, 2018 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@imeron2433 @coveralls